Massachusetts Gaming Commission Allows for Delayed Revere Vote

A rendering that is 3-D of proposed Suffolk Downs casino, now planned for Revere with partner Mohegan Sun (Image: Wendy Maeda/Boston Globe)

They state the house always wins, and appropriate now, prospective casino operators Suffolk Downs and Mohegan Sun are undoubtedly on a winning streak in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission unanimously approved a waiver to the standing deadline for operators to register applications including certified referendum results from their host communities by the end of the season.

Year more Time, Next

That December 31 deadline ended up being going to be a real issue with the Suffolk Downs casino proposal. While the gaming commission had been prepared to let the battle track and partner Mohegan Sun a chance to build a casino solely on land in the town of Revere, it also consented that the original vote taken earlier in the day this year was for the significantly various proposition. As such, a new vote was needed the one that would not have the ability to be held before the year-end deadline.

The decision was one which the panel said they made in a attempt to be since fair as possible to all sides. On November 5, both East Boston and Revere voted on whether to accept a Suffolk Downs casino that might have been primarily and almost entirely situated on the Boston side of the border involving the two communities. East Boston residents voted against that proposal, while Revere voters overwhelmingly approved it.

That left plenty of outstanding questions that are legal the most essential of that was whether Suffolk Downs could now develop a casino entirely on land in Revere, which had approved a casino. The choices ever since then have essentially said that the answer is ‘yes’ but that it’s going to be treated being a unique project that have to be re-approved, separately from the proposal that is previous.

‘We have wrestled hard with racking your brains on how exactly to reconcile the ‘no’ vote in East Boston because of the ‘yes’ vote in Revere, and there is no perfect solution,’ said Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby.

The waiver was the closest to that ‘perfect solution’ that the payment could appear with, thinking about the deadline that is tight. Mohegan Sun must still file their application being a prospective operator by the conclusion of 2013, however a second referendum in Revere will just take spot sometime into the next ninety days after the deadline that is original.

Boston Fires Back

Boston officials opposed the waiver, saying that the vote in East Boston should be ‘respected and maintained’ in a letter to https://real-money-casino.club/winner-online-casino/ the payment. In addition, incoming Boston Mayor-elect Martin Walsh has stated that he’s gotn’t yet ruled out the possibility of taking legal action against this second casino proposal in Revere.

But Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo has expressed confidence that the residents of his city will not just get to vote regarding the casino that is new, but that they can back it using the same types of support they did initial time around. On November 5, 61 percent of Revere voters agreed to endorse the Suffolk Downs casino proposal, though it is not clear if that support will increase or fall now that the casino will actually be in Revere.

Should the new proposal gain approval from voters and regulators, it will get to be the second project to compete for the one available eastern Massachusetts casino license. The other casino proposal for the reason that area is situated in Everett, and would be operated by Wynn Resorts. That project just passed the suitability quotient regarding the gaming commission’s investigations.

Polish Computer Programmers Sentenced for Cyber Blackmail Threats

They might look happy and carefree here, but Polish computer programmers Patryk Surmacki, 35 (left) and Piotr Smirnow, 31 (right) meant no good if they authorized attacks that are cyber two casino sites (Image: Cavendish Press)

Two Polish computer programmers who attempted to blackmail two major unnamed online casino sites one in the united kingdom and something in america have actually now been sentenced to prison, after a police sting nabbed the pair earlier this year.

False Pretenses

Piotr Smirnow, 31, and Patryk Surmacki, 35, approached the master of the UK web site and requested a gathering. The victim who owns A internet that is manchester-based casino met the set under the comprehending that Smirnow had a business proposition for him. He’d known the set for four years before the proposed company meeting, according to authorities reports.

But things took an unsightly turn when, during the meeting which took place at Heathrow Airport’s Terminal 5 the computer coders demanded a 50 percent share associated with the man’s company and threatened to take the casino site down’s servers if he declined.

The set told the master that they knew a notorious computer hacker by the name of ‘Wapo’ into the U.S., who they claimed would carry out the cyber-attack on the business’s servers if the pair paid him to do this, therefore stopping the operations of the company.

Understood being a ‘distributed denial of service’ (DDoS), the court was told that the attack is effective at decreasing also the most sophisticated of websites by overwhelming them via a mass attack of the company’s computer servers.

Cyber Hacker Paid Down

As the business owner refused to hand over 50 % of their company, Smirnow and Surmacki performed their threat on August 2nd and paid the cloaked American hacker £12,000 ($19,700) to accomplish their dirty work. The Manchester-based site went down for five hours, costing business £15,000 ($24,558) when no clients could access the website during that time.

The victim had already alerted Manchester police to the duo’s danger, nonetheless, and another meeting was set up in a hotel that is bugged next to Heathrow Airport on August 7th.

Whenever the dog owner of the business told the pair that he would not cooperate using them, they told him which they had been ‘going to war’ and were then arrested by police who have been on standby.

Smirnow additionally admitted that he had carried out a similar attack on an American victim through a Skype call, during which he stated which they had ‘enough power so individuals can’t try to push us around anymore,’ leading Detective Inspector Mossop to the understanding that the investigation had removed an ’emerging global cyber threat.’ This time the victim was a U.S.-based gaming platform that allows 100 casino sites worldwide.

As for the U.S. site owners, they clearly dodged a bullet.

‘This case made me fear for my safety that is personal well as for future years of my business. And that’s why I felt compelled to do this against the perpetrators,’ stated who owns the casino that is manchester-based, which is projected become worth £30 million ($49,143,000). It is estimated that a week-long attack on e-commerce would have cost the site owner a $600,000 loss, according to court reports.

‘No one should have to succumb to blackmail and also this phrase should act as a warning to those taking part in cyber extortion that the police and the courts will see this type of conduct very really,’ the web site owner added.

Smirnow and Surmacki later pleaded guilty to two charges of blackmail and acts that are unauthorized computers, and were sentenced to 5 years and four months each by Judge Michael Henshaw at the Manchester court. Their own defense team described their attempted blackmail as ‘bizarre, misconceived, naïve and brazen.’

‘They used their intimate, expert knowledge of online business to bully the victims into submission,’ revealed Detective Inspector Chris Mossop associated with Serious Organised Crime Division. ‘ But make no error, they may are making use of the newest technology, but this was merely good antique blackmail.’

Affinity Gaming Hit with Target-Style Security Breach

Nevada and local casino operator Affinity Gaming has been struck by having a credit and debit card protection breach.

It’s not been a good week for the industry that supposedly safeguards our credit and debit card transactions. Just days after a nationwide scandal that pulled within the Secret Service to investigate a massive system hack at popular retailer Target a breach which could end up in fake charges, identity theft, or worse Las Vegas-based casino company Affinity Gaming has been hit by having a fiasco that is similar.

Credit-Processing Systems Compromised

Affinity announced that their credit and debit-processing systems had been hacked by the week-end’s start, and were telling their customers most close that is likely 300,000 of who may have been hit by the hacking to watch their credit info as well as any unauthorized charges to their accounts.

What everyone wants to worry about after blowing their holiday bankroll, right?

But wait, it gets worse. While Target’s breach spanned about five days from around Thanksgiving to a week before Christmas Affinity says theirs hit all 12 of their properties in four U.S. states, and that the breach continued unabated from March 14 of the year all the way right through to October 16: that’s seven months. Incorporated into the properties affected were the business’s popular Nevada stateline gambling enterprises, including Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s, and Primm Valley Resort and Casino.

According to outside legal counsel for Affinity, James Prendergast, the cyber-hack ended up being from a ‘very sophisticated piece of spyware that got into a location that is terrible. It got contained and eradicated and we called in third-party investigators that are forensic confirmation that it was gone,’ Prendergast noted.

Not a way to understand Who Got Hit

Adding to the confusion, because Affinity doesn’t store any customer charge card information in their databases, they don’t have any real means of knowing or notifying whom might have been affected by the net theft. However with casinos scattered throughout Nevada, Colorado, Missouri and Iowa, it most probably could influence a nearly nationwide consumer base, particularly as several gambling enterprises are in or near nevada.

And you could also be in trouble, because that business’s credit and debit processing systems were also hacked, starting on an as-yet-undetermined date and ending on November 29 if you happened to pump gas at Affinity’s Primm Center Gas Station a major stopping point at Nevada’s stateline into California.

So far, the only method Affinity has been able to notify customers of any possible problems happens to be on their website with a ‘public notice of information protection incident,’ but needless to say, many who may have been hit will never see that.

While hacking of this range can fall beneath the purview associated with the Secret Service plus the FBI, both of whom were notified, it positively gets the eye of state regulatory agencies, including Nevada’s Gaming Control Board. GCB Chairman A.G. Burnett states his organization let the Nevada Gaming Commission know of the problems immediately.

‘The business promptly notified us of what happened,’ Burnett explained. ‘These are typically dealing with us closely.’

In terms of Affinity, aside from their website notice and media attention, they are doingn’t have lots of methods to let clients know what’s occurred or what to do about any of it, but in a declaration said that ‘Affinity regrets any inconvenience this incident could cause and has built a confidential, toll-free inquiry line to assist its customers.’

That line, you might have been affected, is open from 8 am to 6 pm Pacific Standard Time, Mondays through Fridays if you think. The quantity to call for U.S. or Canadian residents is 877-238-2179; all the international residents should call Affinity at +1-814-201-3696.

‘Affinity is cooperating within the law that is ongoing investigation of this incident,’ a business statement read. ‘Affinity has also taken lots of measures to strengthen the security of our network and it has caused legal and security vulnerability experts to simply help identify and implement additional appropriate safeguards.’